Dancing and Tending the Spaces-in-Between
On Hospicing and Fugitivity in Transformative Public Sector Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v5i2.10299Keywords:
transformative innovation, transformative research, systems change, Two Loops Model, public sector innovation, innovation labAbstract
This article offers theory-informed, learning-oriented, and imaginative insights into working in and with the unique stuckness of public sector organizations when trying to generate and catalyse transformative innovations on complex challenges. Imagining and enacting systems transformation in the public sector is transdisciplinary, creative, often subversive, and definitely daunting. We focus here on the Two Loops Model as a helpful archetype, a theory of change, and a creative prompt for systems transformation. Unlike many other models of transformation that are ultimately oriented toward finding and scaling solutions, Two Loops shows the dominant and emergent systems in an oscillating dance with a clear space between. We found this space to be an overlooked and potent place of praxis in our work, perhaps particularly so in the public sector, which tends to perpetuate the dominant system even when “innovating.” In this article, we dive deeply into this space to see what new and different perspectives it offers when working on complex challenges. We draw upon Black, Indigenous, queer, feminist, and decolonial scholars to help us think more deeply into this space, which is variously described as fugitive, wayward, hospice, Trickster, break, refusal, and snap. We then engage with this thinking in our own practice space—a public sector innovation lab inside local government. We visualize nine different views into and from this potent space-in-between and how we worked in, with, and from these views in our practice. Using engaged theory, reflective practice, images, metaphor, and poetic language, we aim to open up different possibilities for transformation efforts in the public and other sectors. We invite you to join us as we dwell in the messy, ambiguous, inner and outer work in this space, where we grapple with what we might need to do less of, and what we may need to do more of, in our efforts to move away from the dominant what is, and toward the emergent and resurgent what must be/come.
References
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
Akómoláfé, B. (2023, January 19). Black lives matter, but to whom? Why we need a politics of exile in a time of troubling stuckness. Othering & Belonging Institute. https://belonging.berkeley.edu/black-lives-matter-to-whom
Andrew, M., & Karetai, M. (2022). Bricolage as a method in professional practice. Scope: Contemporary Research Topics (Work-Based Learning), 3, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.34074/scop.6003002
Blomkamp, E. (2018). The promise of co-design for public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 4(77), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12310
Blomkamp, E. (2021). Systemic design practice for participatory policymaking. Policy Design and Practice, 5(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1887576
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23.
Carstensen, H., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering collaborative policy innovation: Can innovation labs help? The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–26.
City of Vancouver. (2018). Navigating complexity: The journey of the City of Vancouver’s Solutions Lab (so far). https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/navigating-complexity-solutions-lab.pdf
City of Vancouver. (2022). Tending to what we want to grow: Continuing on the journey of Vancouver’s Solutions Lab. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/tending-to-what-we-want-to-grow-solutions-lab.pdf
Cole, L. (2022). A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs. Policy Design and Practice, 5(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619
Cole, L., & Hagen, P. (2024). Scaling deep through transformative learning in public sector innovation labs–experiences from Vancouver and Auckland. Public Management Review, 26(7), 2094–2121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2254776
Cole, L., & Kozak, L. (2024). Shifting and sharing power in urban climate justice work: Experiments in transformative learning in Vancouver, Canada. Nature npj Climate Action, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00204-3
Criado, J. I., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Liarte, I. (2025). Two decades of public sector innovation: Building an analytical framework from a systematic literature review of types, strategies, conditions, and results. Public Management Review, 27(3), 623–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2254310
de Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
de Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018). A stakeholder perspective on public sector innovation: Why position matters. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317715513
Enriquez, J. (2024). Becoming-story: A decolonised desire of a colonised ‘I’. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 4(2), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v4i2.8209
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761
Freeman, M. (2017). Modes of thinking for qualitative data analysis. Routledge.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder. (Original work published 1968)
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Geels, F. W. (2019). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009
Goyal, N., & Howlett, M. (2024). Types of learning and varieties of innovation: How does policy learning enable policy innovation? Policy & Politics, 52(4), 564–585. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16841388707452
Gross-Wyrtzen, L., & Moulton, A. A. (2023). Toward ‘fugitivity as method’: An introduction to the special issue. ACME 22(5), 1258–1272. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v22i5.2337
Gunderson L., & Holling C. S. (Eds.). (2001). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press.
Hartman, S. (2019). Wayward lives, beautiful experiments: Intimate histories of riotous black girls, troublesome women, and queer radicals. W.W. Norton & Company.
Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
Hersey, T. (2022). Rest is resistance: A manifesto. Little, Brown Spark.
Hoggan, C. D. (2016). Transformative learning as a metatheory: Definition, criteria, and typology. Adult Education Quarterly, 66(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615611216
Howaldt, J., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44
Imarisha, W. (Ed.). (2015). Octavia's brood: Science fiction stories from social justice movements. AK Press.
Jimmy, E., Andreotti, V., & Stein, S. (2019). Towards braiding. Musagetes.
Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P., Steinberg, S. R., & Monzó, L. D. (2017). Critical pedagogy and qualitative research—Advancing the bricolage. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 235–260). SAGE Publications.
Koenig, O., Pomeroy, E., Seneque, M., & Scharmer, O. (2024). Emergent literacies, cartographies and ecologies for world-making. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v4i2.9100
Kovach, M. (2021). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.
Levins Morales, A. (2024). The story of what is broken is whole: An Aurora Levins Morales reader. Duke University Press.
Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: Characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077
Lewis, J. M., McGann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2020). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420081
Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H., & Ysa, T. (2017). Innovation in city governments: Structures, networks and leadership. Routledge.
Lewis, J. S. (2023). Fugitive Repair. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 22(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v22i5.2376
Lichtenstein, B. B., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: A complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.006
Lorde, A. (2020). The selected works of Audre Lorde (R. Gay, Ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.
Machado de Oliveira, V. (2021). Hospicing modernity: Facing humanity's wrongs and the implications for social activism. North Atlantic Books.
Maynard, R., & Simpson, L. B. (2022). Rehearsals for living. Alfred A. Knopf Canada.
McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
Melacarne, C. & Nicolaides, A. (2019). Developing professional capability: Growing capacity and competencies to meet complex workplace demands. New directions for adult and continuing Education, 163, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20340
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass.
Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: Comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(4), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787
O'Sullivan, E., Morrell, A., & O'Connor, M. A. (2002). Expanding the boundaries of transformative learning: Essays on theory and praxis. Palgrave.
Potts, K. L., & Brown, L. (2015). Becoming an anti-oppressive researcher. In L. Brown, & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Revisiting critical, Indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches (2nd ed., pp. 17–41). Canadian Scholars.
Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). i-teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. Nesta & Bloomberg Philanthropies.
Robinson, R. (2019). A portable paradise. Peepal Tree Press.
Roy, A. (2005). An ordinary person's guide to empire. Penguin Viking.
Scharmer, C. O. (2016). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges: The social technology of presencing (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Sharpe, B., Hodgson, A., Leicester, G., Lyon, A., & Fazey, I. (2016). Three horizons: A pathways practice for transformation. Ecology and Society, 21(2), Article 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08388-210247
Sim, E., & Nicolaides, A. (2024). Slow-looking at transformative learning through the lens of enactivism. Journal of Transformative Education, 22(2), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/15413446231221966
Simpson, L. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. University of Minnesota Press.
Simpson, L. B. (2025). Theory of water: Nishnaabe maps to the times ahead. Alchemy by Knopf Canada.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
Strega, S., & Brown, L. (2015). Introduction: From resistance to resurgence. In L. Brown, & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Revisiting critical, Indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–16). Canadian Scholars.
Taylor, E. W. (2009). Fostering transformative learning. In J. Mezirow, & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 3–17). Jossey-Bass.
Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
Transforming Cities. (2025). Foundations and tools: Inner work. Transforming Cities from Within. https://www.transformingcities.ca/inner-work
Wellstead, A. M., Gofen, A., & Carter, A. (2021). Policy innovation lab scholarship: Past, present, and the future – Introduction to the special issue on policy innovation labs. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1940700
Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–19.
Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Homer-Dixon, T., Vredenburg, H., Loorbach, D., Thompson, J., Nilsson, M., Lambin, E., Sendzimir, J., Banerjee, B., Galaz, V., & van der Leeuw, S. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio, 40, 762–780.
Westley, F., McGowan, K., & Tjörnbo, O. (2017). The evolution of social innovation: Building resilience through transitions. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wheatley, M. J., & Frieze, D. (2011). Walk out, walk on: A learning journey into communities daring to live the future now. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
Yardley, A. (2019). Bricolage and bricoleur. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036815632
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lindsay Cole
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
