A Pattern Language for Social Field Shifts

Cultivating Embodied and Perceptual Capacities of Social Groups Through Aesthetics, and Social Field Archetypes

Authors

  • Ricardo Dutra Gonçalves Art Design & Architecture, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Arawana Hayashi Presencing Institute, Boston, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.478

Keywords:

awareness-based action research, Social Presencing Theater, social fields, design probes, social arts, phenomenological research

Abstract

The complex systemic issues of today, including climate change, racism, social inequality, mental health crisis, call for new ways of engaging the heart (feeling), mind (thinking), and will (doing) to actually change deep-rooted behaviors. To develop these new ways of engaging, one must learn how to cultivate first, one’s interior condition (the inner place from which we operate) and second, one's capacities to co-create with others the exterior conditions for healthy social relationships. In this paper, we claim that by living in a body we are embodied and that wisdom lives in a holistic knowing that includes embodied intelligence. We argue that to address the complex challenges of our times, we must cultivate embodied and perceptual capacities and a language for our embodied experience(s). Over three years of workshops with advanced practitioners of an embodied practice called Social Presencing Theater (SPT), we used embodied activities and design prompts (drawing, photo, video) to surface and make visible social patterns. This has led us to develop a language in the context of social systems change, in particular of social field shifts (i.e., transformations in the relational and felt qualities of our social systems). Through this paper we aim to contribute to social field research by proposing an embodied, visual, and verbal language for social groups to describe and reflect on social field shifts, made up of two parts: first, an aesthetic language to describe social field qualities; and second, three families of social field archetypes to describe social fields.

References

Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order: an essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe, Book 1 - The phenomenon of life. Oxford University Press.

Alexander, C., Ishikawa, Sara, & Silverstein, Murray. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.

Beuys, J. (2004). What is art? Conversation with Joseph Beuys. Clairview Books.

Bogart, A., Landau, Tina, & ProQuest. (2005). The viewpoints book: A practical guide to viewpoints and composition (1st ed.). Theatre Communications Group.

Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing (1st ed. 2006.). Springer London Ltd.

Depraz, N., Varela, Francisco J., & Vermersch, Pierre. (2003). On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. John Benjamins Pub.

Goncalves, R. D. (2019). Aesthetics as a pattern language for social field shifts. Field of the Future Blog by Presencing Institute. https://medium.com/presencing-institute-blog/aesthetics-a-pattern-language-for-social-field-shifts-f847ce9fb2e8

Goncalves, R. D. (2019). Social reality contemplation: A performance-led approach to making visible deeper layers of social fields. Field of the Future Blog by Presencing Institute. https://www.presencing.org/news/news/social-reality-contemplation

Grocott, L. (2010). Design research & reflective practice. [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Hayashi, A. (2019). Social Presencing Theater. Presencing Institute. https://www.presencing.org/aboutus/spt

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Harper & Row.

Heron, J., & Reason, Peter. (2008). Extending epistemology within a co-operative inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 366-380). Sage Publications.

Hunt, J. (2012). Letter from the editor. The Journal of Design Strategies, 5(1), 5-10. https://vizuarna.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/jds-vol5-screen-1.pdf

Janevski, A., & Lax, T. J. (2018). Judson Dance Theater: The work is never done, by Judson Dance Theater. The Museum of Modern Art.

Kaufman, M., & McAdams, B. P. (2018). Moment work: Tectonic theater project’s process of devising theater. Vintage Books.

Knowles, J. G., Cole, Ardra L, & ProQuest. (2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Sage Publications.

Kolko, J. (2011) Exposing the magic of design: A practitioner’s guide to the methods and theory of synthesis. Oxford University Press.

Lewin, K. (1966). Principles of topological psychology. McGraw Hill.

Lidwell, W., Kritina, H., & Butler, J. (2003) Universal principles of design. Rockport.

Mattelmäki, T. (2005). Applying probes - from inspirational notes to collaborative insights. CoDesign, 1(2), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15719880500135821

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945, 2012). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.

Maturana, H.R. (1987). Everything said is said by an observer. In W.I. Thompson (Ed.), Gaia: A way of knowing. Political implications of the new biology (pp. 65-82). Lindisfarne Press.

Meadows, Donella H. & Wright, Diana. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Earthscan.

Overlie, M. (2016). Standing in space: The six viewpoints theory & practice. FellonPress.

Petitmengin, C., Remillieux, A., and Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C. (2019). Discovering the structures of lived experience: Toward a micro-phenomenological analysis method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, (18), 691–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9597-4

Pilgrim, R. B. (1987). Ma: A cultural paradigm, Chanoyu Quarterly - Tea and the Arts of Japan, (46).

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Scharmer, C. O. (2009). Theory U: Learning from the future as it emerges (1st ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Scharmer, C. O. 2018. The essentials of Theory U: Core principles and applications. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Scharmer, O., & Kaeufer, K. (2015). Awareness-based action research: Catching social reality creation in flight. In H. Bradbury, The SAGE handbook of action research, (pp. 199-210). Sage Publications.

Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Senge, P. M. (1994). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning. Doubleday/Currency.

Suzuki, S. (2011). Zen mind, beginner’s mind: Informal talks on zen meditation and practice. Shambhala.

Trungpa, C. (1996). True perception: The path of dharma art. Shambhala Publications.

United Nations. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

Varela, F. J., Thompson, Evan, & Rosch, Eleanor. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.

Published

2021-02-25

How to Cite

Dutra Gonçalves, R., & Hayashi, A. (2021). A Pattern Language for Social Field Shifts: Cultivating Embodied and Perceptual Capacities of Social Groups Through Aesthetics, and Social Field Archetypes . Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 1(1), 35-57. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.478