A Deep Dive Into Social Field Shifts

Examining Field Autonomy and Malleability During an Awareness-Based Change Program

Authors

  • Lukas Herrmann Institute for Medical Psychology, University Heidelberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v3i2.6283

Keywords:

social field, awareness-based systems change, organizational development, organizational culture, relational awareness, systems sensing

Abstract

Social fields have garnered increasing interest among practitioners and researchers, particularly due to the need to address multiple intersecting crises and their societal and organizational impacts. A recent conceptualization by Pomeroy and Herrmann (2023) proposes that social fields have a degree of autonomy that perpetuates phenomena like interaction patterns. The study adopts this lens to empirically examine the shifts at three schools during a longitudinal awareness-based change program. In-depth interviews with school professionals provide insights into the potential of relational awareness to “dive below the vortex” of autonomous and de-generative interaction cycles, facilitating a transition towards responsive and generative cycles. However, while field autonomy was transformed across the entire organization in some cases, persistent patterns were observed in others, indicating variations in the malleability of social fields. The implications of these findings for promoting organizational change are discussed.

References

Bion, W. R. (1952). Group dynamics: A review. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 33(2), 235–247. https://tpocambodia.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Bion-Group-Dynamics-A-Review.pdf

Bockler, J. (2022). Group coherence: Its shadow and its generative potential. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 2(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v2i2.5059

Boell, M. M., & Senge, P. (2016). School climate and social fields: An initial exploration. Garrison Global Collaboration for Emotional, Social and Systems Education & MIT. https://www.garrisoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/SCSF_report_revised_edition_june2016_web_opslag.pdf

Boonstra, J. J., & Bennebroek Gravenhorst, K. M. (1998). Power dynamics and organizational change: A comparison of perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943298398826

Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology (M. Adamson, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1987).

Bowen, M. (1966). The use of family theory in clinical practice. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 7(5), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X(66)80065-2

Brabant, M., & DiPerna, D. (2016). Initial mapping and the eternal mystery of we-space: Cartography, capacities, and consciousness in the inter-subjective field. In O. Gunnlaugson & M. Brabant (Eds.), Cohering the integral we space: Engaging collective emergence, wisdom and healing in groups (pp. 19–39). Integral Publishing House.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

de Jaegher, H., & di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9

Foulkes, S. H. (1975). A short outline of the therapeutic processes in group-analytic psychotherapy. Group Analysis, 8(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/053331647500800111

Fuchs, T. (2000). Leib, Raum, Person. Entwurf einer phänomenologischen Anthropologie [Body, space, person. Outline of a phenomenological anthropology]. Klett-Cotta.

Fuchs, T. (2013). The phenomenology of affectivity. In K. W. M. Fulford, M. Davies, R. Gipps, G. Graham, J. Z. Sadler, G. Stanghellini & T. Thornton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry (pp. 612–631). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579563.013.0038

Fuchs, T. (2016). Intercorporeality and interaffectivity. Phenomenology and Mind, 11, 194–209. https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-20119

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Gonçalves, R. D., & Hayashi, A. (2021). A pattern language for social field shifts: Cultivating embodied and perceptual capacities of social groups through aesthetics, and social field archetypes. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 1(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.478

Guenther, S. (2022). From me to we: A phenomenological inquiry into coherence. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 2(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v2i2.3398

Herrmann, L., Nielsen, B. L., & Aguilar-Raab, C. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on interpersonal aspects in elementary school. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 635180. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.635180

Hopper, E. (2009). The theory of the basic assumption of incohesion: Aggregation/massification or (BA) I: A/M. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 25(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.2009.01116.x

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

Jensen, H. (2014). Hellwach und ganz bei sich [Wide awake and completely with oneself]. Beltz Verlag.

Juul, J., & Jensen, H. (2017). Relational competence: Towards a new culture of education (S. Grabner, Trans.). Edition + Plus. (Original work published 2002).

Juul, J., Høeg, P., Jensen, H., Bertelsen, P., Stubberup, M., & Hildebrandt, S. (2016). Empathy. It's what holds the world together (M. Kline, Trans.). Morawa Lesezirkel. (Original work published 2012).

Kok, B. E., & Singer, T. (2017). Effects of contemplative dyads on engagement and perceived social connectedness over 9 months of mental training: A randomized clinical trial. Jama Psychiatry, 74(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3360

Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the 'field at a given time'. Psychological Review, 50(3), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062738

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.). Harper & Brothers.

Mahfouz, J., Greenberg, M. T., & Rodriguez, A. (2019). Principals’ social and emotional competence: A key factor for creating caring schools. Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University.

Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Problems in the neurophysiology of cognition. In H. R. Maturana & F. J. Varela (Eds.), Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (pp. 41–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4_5

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception: And other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history, and politics (J. M. Edie, Ed.). Northwestern University Press.

Murray, C., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). The importance of teacher-student relationships for adolescents with high incidence disabilities. Theory Into Practice, 46(2), 105–112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40071476

Nielsen, A. M., & Petersen, F. F. (2021). Affectivity and relational awareness in pedagogy and education: Moments of hesitation in intersubjective encounters. International Review of Theoretical Psychologies, 1(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v1i2.128018

OECD (2019). Learning compass 2030. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.

Pomeroy, E., & Herrmann, L. (2023). Social fields: Knowing the water we swim in. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231174957

Scharmer, O. (2016). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to eco-system economies. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Schein, E. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9–20. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/three-cultures-of-management-the-key-to-organizational-learning/

Schuyler, K. G., Watson, L. W., & Wilson, P. A. (2022). A world with space for all to be: Generative mindfulness, awareness-based action research, and inclusion. In G. Donneli & A. Montuori (Eds.), Routledge handbook for creative futures (pp. 343–353). Routledge.

Senge, P., Boell, M., Cook, L., Martin, J., Lynn, K., Haygaru, T., Gruen, S., & Urrea, C. (2019). Introduction to compassionate systems framework in schools. Abdul Latif Jameel World Education Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.

Siegel, D. J. (2020). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Tomm, K., St. George, S., Wulff, D., & Strong, T. (Eds.). (2014). Patterns in interpersonal interactions: Inviting relational understandings for therapeutic change. Routledge.

Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., Mainhard, T., den Brok, P., & van Tartwijk, J. (2016). Teacher-student relationships and student achievement. In K. R. Wentzel & G. B. Ramani (Eds.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts: Social-emotional, motivation, and cognitive outcomes (pp. 127–142). Routledge.

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Herrmann, L. (2023). A Deep Dive Into Social Field Shifts: Examining Field Autonomy and Malleability During an Awareness-Based Change Program. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 3(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v3i2.6283

Issue

Section

Original Articles (Peer-Reviewed)