Fourth Person
The Knowing of the Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v4i1.7909Keywords:
fourth-person knowing, Theory U, social field, trans-subjectivity, self-transcending knowledge, presencing, awareness-based systems changeAbstract
In the context of polycrisis and systemic collapse, the primary challenge we face is a widely shared sense of collective depression—a lack of agency in regard to the bigger picture. What does it take to serve evolutionary transformation in the face of systemic collapse? In our view, it takes a form of knowing which extends beyond the current constructs of first-, second- and third-person knowing around which much of our current learning, knowledge, and leadership systems are organized. In this paper, we suggest fourth-person knowing as a distinct epistemology at the intersection of the other three, and we draw on our action research to illuminate five phenomena that point to and distinguish fourth-person knowing: (1) knowing that comes through me but is not of me; (2) knowing that shows up in my individual experience as a decentering of perception; (3) a heightened sense of potential, of possibilities that previously were experienced as unattainable now appear to be in reach; (4) sensing your own agency in helping the ‘universe’ (the larger field) to evolve; and (5) significant long term impact in terms of practical results. It is our hope that by articulating fourth person knowing we can provide an epistemic basis upon which research and inquiry methodologies can be built, complementing first-, second- and third-person forms of inquiry, methodologies based on deep sensing and presencing that support individuals and collectives to recognize, connect with and manifest what is theirs to do in the wider context of this moment and the incipient patterns of emergence and movement making.
References
Bird, K. (2018). Generative scribing: A social art of the 21st century. PI Press.
Bockler, J. (2022). Group coherence: Its shadow and its generative potential. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 2(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v2i2.5059
Bradbury, H. (Ed.). (2015). The SAGE handbook of action research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Brydon-Miller, M., & Coghlan, D. (2019). First-, second-and third-person values-based ethics in educational action research: Personal resonance, mutual regard and social responsibility. Educational Action Research, 27(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1445539
Buber, M. (1966). The way of response. Schocken Books.
Buber, M. (1970). I and thou (Vol. 243). Simon and Schuster.
Coghlan, D. (2019). Doing action research in your own organization. SAGE.
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
De Quincey, C. (2000). Intersubjectivity: Exploring consciousness from the second-person perspective. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 32(2), 135–156.
Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (Eds.). (2003). On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing (Vol. 43). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.43
Gallese, V. (2014). Bodily selves in relation: Embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: biological sciences, 369(1644), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0177
Gearty, M. R., & Coghlan, D. (2018). The first-, second-and third-person dynamics of learning history. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 31, 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9436-5
Gilbert, E. (2016). Big magic: Creative living beyond fear. Penguin.
Goodchild, M. (2021). Relational systems thinking: That’s how change is going to come, from our Earth Mother. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 1(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.577
Goodchild, M. (2022). Relational systems thinking: The Dibaajimowin (story) of re-theorizing “systems thinking” and “complexity science”. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 2(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v2i1.2027
Hodgson, A. (2013). Towards an ontology of the present moment. On the Horizon, 21(1), 24–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748121311297049
Hopper, E. (2009). The theory of the basic assumption of incohesion: Aggregation/massification or (BA) I: A/M. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 25(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.2009.01116.x
Hynes, G. (2013). First, second, and third person inquiry. In K. Froggatt, J. Hockley, & K. Heimerl (Eds.), Participatory research in palliative care: Actions and reflections (pp. 53–63). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644155.003.0005
Janis, I. L. (1997). Groupthink. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 163–176). University of Notre Dame Press. (Reprinted from Psychology Today, November 1971, 443–447)
Johnson, T., Allport, T. & Boulton, A. (2024). Te Ruru: Co-creating an Indigenous systems change framework. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 4(1),49–75.
Kaiser, N., & Butler, E. (2021). Introducing social breathing: A model of engaging in relational systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 571298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.571298
Marshall, J. (2004). Living systemic thinking: Exploring quality in first-person action research. Action Research, 2(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750304045945
Marshall, J. (2015). First-person action research and critical reflection. In J. Fook, V. Collington, F. Ross, G. Ruch, & L. West (Eds.), Researching critical reflection (pp. 133–142). Routledge.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1991). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (Vol. 42). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4
Mitchell, S. (2018). Sacred instructions: Indigenous wisdom for living spirit-based change. North Atlantic Books.
Moore, C., & Barresi, J. (2017). The role of second-person information in the development of social understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 277164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01667
Pauen, M. (2012). The second-person perspective. Inquiry, 55(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2012.643623
Pomeroy, E., & Herrmann, L. (2023). Social fields: Knowing the water we swim in. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 00218863231174957. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231174957
Pomeroy, E., Herrmann, L., Jung, S., Laenens, E., Pastorini, L., & Ruiter, A. (2021). Exploring action research from a social field perspective. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 1(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.676
Pomeroy, E., & Oliver, K. (2018). Pushing the boundaries of self-directed learning: Research findings from a study of u. lab participants in Scotland. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(6), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2018.1550447
Pomeroy, E., & Oliver, K. (2021). Action confidence as an indicator of transformative change. Journal of Transformative Education, 19(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2018.1550447
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Concluding reflections: Whither action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 695–707). SAGE Publications.
Reason, P., & Torbert, W. (2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformation, 6(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea
Redcay, E., & Schilbach, L. (2019). Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(8), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0179-4
Rosa, H. (2018). The idea of resonance as a sociological concept. Global Dialogue, 8(2), 41–44.
Scharmer, O. (2000, January 12). Three gestures of becoming aware: A conversation with Francisco Varela. https://pi2022.s3.amazonaws.com/doc_varela_2000_32d1683924.pdf
Scharmer, O. (2001). Self‐transcending knowledge: Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110393185
Scharmer, O. (2003, September 15–16). The presence of the circle being: Conversation with the Circle of Seven. https://pi-2022.s3.amazonaws.com/doc_Co7_2003_2e4aed0664.pdf
Scharmer, O. (2017, December 7). The blind spot: Uncovering the grammar of the social field. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/uncovering-the-grammar-of-the-social-field_b_7524910
Scharmer, O. (2016). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Scharmer, O. (2018). The essentials of Theory U: Core principles and applications. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to eco-system economies. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (forthcoming). Presencing: 7 Practices for transforming self, society, and business. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Scharmer, O., Pomeroy, E., & Kaufer, K. (2021). Awareness-based action research: Making systems sense and see themselves. In D. Burns, J. Howard, & S. Ospina (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of participatory research and enquiry (pp. 633–648). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529769432.n45
Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393715
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain sciences, 36(4), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000660
Tomasello, M. (2022). The evolution of agency: Behavioral organization from lizards to humans. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14238.001.0001
Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (1999). First-person methodologies: What, why, how. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2-3), 1–14.
Yunkaporta, T. (2019). Sand talk: How Indigenous thinking can save the world. Text Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Otto Scharmer, Eva Pomeroy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
